Renowned economist and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Economic Advisory Council chairman Bibek Debroy explains how India is on the right path to become a $5-trillion economy
Over the past few years, India has often been tagged as one of the fastest growing world economies, a scenario that looks even brighter when pitted against the global economic slowdown. The Indian government has announced an aspirational target of making India a $5 trillion economy by 2024-25. While some have been calling this unachievable, most ignore the massive size of the Indian economy while making predictions. Even if it grows at a slower pace, India’s contribution to the world economy will be larger due to its volumes.
A GDP growth rate of eight per cent is required to meet the $ 5 trillion target and the government’s initiatives of efficient public expenditure, efficient land, labour and capital markets and stimulating productivity and entrepreneurship are meant to trigger this. Needless to say that there is enough slack in Indian states to deliver an eight per cent growth. A higher GDP is not just a number. It translates into higher incomes, more employment, better living conditions, lower poverty and improved socio- economic indicators. While a slowdown has been witnessed in the last quarter, India’s monetary and fiscal stimulus has already begun to kick in and will show soon. Looking at the current status, one can assume that in the financial year 2019-20, India will have a real GDP growth of around five per cent. Next year, in 2020-21, the growth rate will increase to at least six per cent and inch towards another half per cent more.
One of the successes of macroeconomic management since 2014 has been control of inflation. Inflation is a regressive tax. It hurts the poor relatively more than it hurts the relatively rich. Six per cent real growth and four per cent inflation yield 10 per cent nominal growth, while six per cent real growth and nine per cent inflation yield 15 percent nominal growth. While 15 per cent nominal growth may make one feel better than a 10 per cent nominal growth, but the latter, with lower inflation, is preferable. However, the aim is to move India to a higher growth trajectory. Since 2014, and the policies of the second Narendra Modi government are a logical continuation of the first, the building blocks are being put in place to ensure precisely that. But first, the external environment is unkind, global uncertainty affects India’s export and growth prospects too. Not too many countries are likely to grow at six per cent. Second, there is plenty of internal slack in the system and endogenous sources of growth.
Historically, India’s governance has been excessively centralized. Since 2014, there has been institutional change, making governance more decentralized. An example of this is the way GST (Goods and Services Tax) Council functions.
Decentralized governance is more than mere fiscal devolution, though this too has occurred through recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission.
“India has already embraced new paradigms such as the sharing economy with aggregator platforms displacing conventional businesses. Government has harnessed new technologies to enable direct benefit transfers and financial inclusion on a scale never imagined before.” – Nirmala Sitharaman, Minister of Finance of India
Third, inclusion has to be interpreted in the sense of public provisioning of physical and social infrastructure. Dashboards, available in the public domain, illustrate improvements in availability of roads (and other forms of transport), electricity, gas connections, toilets, sanitation, housing, schools (and higher education), skills, medical treatment, insurance, pensions, bank accounts and credit. The veracity of what dashboards show has been confirmed through third party validation. This improvement is especially evident in rural India. That’s the reason the UNDP’s recent Human Development using what is known as SECC (Socio- Economic Caste Census). This survey is used to identify beneficiaries, both for Union and state-level schemes, eliminating leakage and multiplicity. Subsidies are now channeled into bank accounts and linked to Aadhaar (Aadhaar is an identification number issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India to every resident of the country). Productivity gains from such inclusion initiatives and empowerment cannot be immediately quantified in economic terms. But they are palpable (and confirmed anecdotally, such as in the switch from firewood to LPG, or provision of toilets, or Mudra loans) and will enable India to reap the demographic dividend contribution to growth.
Fourth, that inclusion and economic empowerment agenda is against the background of improving both the citizen’s ease of living and the entrepreneur’s ease of doing business. An entrepreneur is not necessarily a corporate entrepreneur. Nor is ease of doing business only about the World Bank’s ease of doing business indicators, where too, India’s rank has improved. The ease of doing business initiative under the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) or the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, has improved the business and investment climate in all states. Modernization of land records and cleaner titles is also work in progress. Investment figures (including FDI) show improvements.
Fifth, the institutional cleaning up is bound to have adverse consequences for growth in the short run. Examples of such institutional cleansing are the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, scrutiny of illegal financial transactions, clamping down on shell companies, an insolvency and bankruptcy code and improved tax compliance. These will lead to immediate growth costs, traded off against efficiency gains in the future.
Union government finances have been managed well, with no deviations from the goal of fiscal consolidation. Tax reform is a work in progress and the corporate tax rate has already been reduced. For both direct and indirect taxes, the agenda is simplification and elimination of exemptions, leading to lower compliance costs. Thus, the broad message is that a five per cent GDP in 2019-20 shouldn’t lead to gloom and doom; there is a higher growth trajectory in the offing.
Broadly, India is in the process of making land (and natural resources), labor and capital markets more competitive and efficient, with not just entry, but exit as well.
Bibek Debroy is currently serving as the Chairman of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister. A member of the Niti Aayog, he was the Chairman of the Committee to restructure Indian Railways. He has authored and translated several books in the field of Economics, Polity, Indology and Sanskrit.
WHAT THE ECONOMIC SURVEY SAYS ABOUT THE FUTURE
According to the Economic Survey 2019-20 prepared under Krishnamurthy Subramanian (Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India), India’s GDP growth is expected to grow in the range of 6.0 to 6.5 per cent in 2020-21.
Economic growth is expected to pick up and a strong rebound could be seen in FY21 on a low base.
Easing of monetary policy by the Reserve Bank of India and several measures announced by the government in the last year present green shoots for growth.
India’s exports increased by 13.4 per cent for manufactured products and 10.9 per cent for total merchandise.
India gained 0.7 per cent increase in trade surplus per year for manufactured products and 2.3 per cent per year for total merchandise.
India is also pushing towards sustainable economic growth.
Forest and tree cover increased and has reached 80.73 million hectares covering 25.56 per cent of the geographical area of the country.
India ranks third in terms of number of new firms created.
According to the survey, from about 70,000 new firms created in 2014, the number has grown by about 80 per cent to about 1,24,000 new firms in 2018.
In World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business rankings, India has leapfrogged to 63 position
In the resolving insolvency rankings, India has moved from 108th to 52nd position
In the Global Innovation rankings, from 74th to 52nd position India improved international ranking by 10 points on Logistics Performance
India moved from 52nd to 34th position in World Economic Forum’s Travel and Tourism Competitiveness rankings