[The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of The South Asian Times]
By Vipul Tamhane
Can American political leaders place the capacity of the nation to function above partisan advantage? History suggests that they can.
The United States is dealing with a government shutdown, a number of immigration crises, and growing structural issues, but one thing is certain about the state of American democracy: it has never been dependent on one-of-two-party status, a total bipartisanship, or a fusion of independent and bipartisan, but rather, the health of democracy has permissively rested upon that occasion when Democrats and Republicans set aside partisan differences to serve for the common good. At this moment in time, when polarization is straightening out our government, bipartisan leadership is much needed, even demanded, to promote democracy.
The historical foundation of bipartisan success
The Constitution (1787) was born from a "great compromise" between the opposing Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives, both of which had reasoning about how they wanted to balance the power of state autonomy and central authority. After the Constitution was ratified by enough states to go into effect, the Bill of Rights was ratified (1791) when the Federalist side of the debate came to terms with the Anti-Federalists to guarantee civil liberties would be written as part of the Constitution. It was an act of cooperation in a new democracy by both sides. This archaic practice has repeated itself throughout American history.
The Reconstruction Amendments, having eliminated slavery, created citizenship and voting rights for all, despite strife in both the Federalists and Anti-Federalist factions, even if there was conflict in the three-party struggle. Real landmarks in law, like the Civil Rights Act (1964), were enacted because Democratic President Lyndon Johnson got strong support from Republican Senate leader Everett Dirksen, in order to legally abolish segregated facilities and give full citizenship to millions.
Then, there is the stark (but successful) Marshall Plan for the reconstruction of post-war Europe, and its continued efforts to develop Western democracies. With Truman as a Democratic President but a Republican Congress, the Marshall Plan was formulated and effectively implemented. In the more contemporary examples, the Americans with Disabilities Act (1990), welfare reform (1996), and the various measures of post-9/11 homeland security demonstrated again that, when the national interest eclipsed partisan calculation, American democracy delivers - and even in the case of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (2021) in which 19 Republican Senators voted alongside all of the Democrats.
The mechanics of effective bipartisan leadership
The US Constitution was intentionally designed to create a system that depended on collaboration. The separation of powers, executive, legislative, and judicial, minimizes the chance that any one allegiance would be able to govern without collaboration. Variables of a bicameral legislature, where a Senate is comprised of equal representation and the House is representative of the population, require that competing interests negotiate diverging agendas.
The founders recognized that democracy thrives upon not ideological purity but institutional constraints, deliberative process, and accountability. Collaboration from both parties is not only a process but also relies on certain competencies: co-sponsoring of legislation by both parties, an active bipartisan caucus action, structured negotiation, and cooperation by uplifting civility to a racial level and falling back on collaboration rather than retaliation. Research shows that members of Congress who are people-oriented come from bipartisan co-sponsored bills have a much greater realization of their agendas than those at the oppositum.
Collaboration between both parties relies on certain competencies that cannot be ignored: through active listening to a conflicting opinion, through relationship building, where the relationship can be rekindled even though they have conflicting perspectives and motivations for substantive communal appreciation of shared outcomes, and but at the same time but also recognize when they are sharing common ground although they are approaching matters differently and have different motivations. However, this is not simply a skill at the neighborhood table; this is a governance necessity.
Current opportunities and urgent imperatives
Presently, five pressing concerns need bipartisan maturity. First, the federal government shutdown, which was initiated on October 1, 2025, is an unadulterated failure of governance. Funding the operation of government is not a negotiable item, and a government shutdown can only harm government services, undermine economic confidence, and damage America's global image. Our allies, potential investors, and financial markets are paying attention to whether the United States can govern itself.
Second, immigration and border issues are still at a boiling point. Recent Federal action and competing Federal-State interests, bundled with another patchwork approach, satisfy no one. A meaningful immigration policy requires a combination of enforcement, humanitarian responsibility, a legal system for entry, and economic opportunity, and that is not possible without a greater and engaged membership base across party lines.
Third, neither climate change nor energy transitions nor the infrastructure deficits that prevent us from achieving that transition can be set aside for political convenience. The post-2022 midterm delay of bipartisan energy permitting reform to appease election-cycle political calculus certainly reflects how our parties will willingly sacrifice the long-term interests of the nation. Infrastructure, and by extension energy policy and climate resilience, need the certainty of investment and the stability of regulatory oversight that can only come from bipartisan agreement.
Fourth, the demands for an urgent technology policy - especially around governance of artificial intelligence, a workforce transition, and privacy protection are staggering. Most legislation on AI currently is fragmented, partisan bills. A balanced approach to regulation of privacy, security, employment, and competitiveness is a priority, but we do not even scratch the surface of responsible use from a partisan perspective.
Finally, and perhaps the most dangerous, is the erosion of institutional legitimacy itself. Polls ask America if they believe there is any common ground between the two parties on the major issues that are essentially American social services. The belief becomes self-fulfilling. After the midterm elections, civic faith in political parties must demonstrate safely that they can act together for the common good. After all, the actions in and of themselves build trust in a democratic process.
The cost of continued gridlock
If bipartisan cooperation does not occur, the ramifications are significant. Stalled legislation simply delays important investments in infrastructure and health, and security. The polarization merely worsens, disempowering the institutional checks and balances, and engendering threats of bipartisanship-related government shutdowns and constitutional stress. Strategically, the US lags in supply chain security, technological competition, and climate resilience. Public disillusionment grows, turnout declines, extremism splinters mainstream politics, and moderate voices wither.
On the global scale, democratic governance itself loses credibility. As a benchmark liberal democracy, American dysfunction sends a signal to the world that democratic systems cannot perform. Authoritarian models appear more appealing. The confidence of allies in US leadership decreases.
Conclusion: Leadership beyond partisanship
At the end of the day, bipartisan leadership is about governing capacity, not electoral politics. Bipartisan leadership acknowledges that in a pluralist democracy, we have legitimate differences. But when national interest demands action, we have a commitment to enter a shared purpose. The founders built a governance system that required cooperation from its inception. The leaders of today must honor that design.
The question is clear: Can American political leaders demonstrate the maturity, relationship-building, and respect for democratic institutions that a democracy requires? Can they place the capacity of the nation to function above partisan advantage? History suggests that they can. The question is whether contemporary leaders have the courage and vision to do what former leaders did. Democracy endures not through agreement at every turn but rather through strategic cooperation at key moments. Bipartisan leadership acts as a safety valve of sorts, allowing through divided governance to avoid implosion and preserve adaptive governance. In a country that has national emergencies and can restore effective global leadership, bipartisan success is not optional; it is a requirement.
----------------------------------------------------
.jpg)
(Vipul Tamhane is a counter-terrorism expert and governance consultant)
